Overheid.nl| Zoekpagina

De wegwijzer naar informatie en diensten van alle overheden

Zoeken Uitgebreid zoeken
Startpagina

Verdrag

Depositair

Verdrag tot afschaffing van het vereiste van legalisatie van buitenlandse openbare akten

Overzicht van wijzigingen in het afgelopen jaar.

Partijen(12 September 2018)

Partij Ondertekening Voorlopige toepassing Ratificatie

O=Ondertekening zonder voorbehoud of vereiste van ratificatie
R=Bekrachtiging, aanvaarding, goedkeuring of kennisgeving
T=Toetreding
VG=Voortgezette gebondenheid
NB=Niet bekend

In werking Opzegging Buiten werking
Filipijnen 12-09-2018 (T) 14-05-2019

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(12 September 2018)

Filipijnen, 12-09-2018

The Government of the Republic of the Philippines wishes to draw the attention of State Parties to the Apostille Convention to Sections 4 and 5 of the Philippine Extradition Law (Presidential Decree No. 1069 [s.1977]) which pertains to documents submitted to the Government of the Philippines in support of extradition requests, and wish to convey that the Apostille Convention does not supersede or override the provisions of the Philippine Extradition Law. The Certification by apostille under the Apostille Convention does not satisfy the requirements under the Philippine Extradition Law. Extradition requests directed to the Republic of the Philippines should be conveyed in the manner provided for by the Philippine Extradition Law.

Autoriteiten Filipijnen(12 September 2018)

12-09-2018

Competent Authority: Authentication Division Office of Consular Affairs Department of Foreign Affairs

Partijen(29 Augustus 2018)

Partij Ondertekening Voorlopige toepassing Ratificatie

O=Ondertekening zonder voorbehoud of vereiste van ratificatie
R=Bekrachtiging, aanvaarding, goedkeuring of kennisgeving
T=Toetreding
VG=Voortgezette gebondenheid
NB=Niet bekend

In werking Opzegging Buiten werking
Eswatini 03-07-1978 (VG) 06-09-1968

Partijen(29 Augustus 2018)

Partij Ondertekening Voorlopige toepassing Ratificatie

O=Ondertekening zonder voorbehoud of vereiste van ratificatie
R=Bekrachtiging, aanvaarding, goedkeuring of kennisgeving
T=Toetreding
VG=Voortgezette gebondenheid
NB=Niet bekend

In werking Opzegging Buiten werking
Swaziland 03-07-1978 (VG) 06-09-1968

Autoriteiten Eswatini(29 Augustus 2018)

03-07-1978

Central Authority: The Principal Secretary's Office in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Autoriteiten Swaziland(29 Augustus 2018)

03-07-1978

Central Authority: The Principal Secretary's Office in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Autoriteiten Moldavië(24 Augustus 2018)

14-08-2018

(modification) For administrative documents: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration For all other public documents: The Ministry of Justice, the Agency for Legal Information Technology Resources

Partijen(16 Augustus 2018)

Partij Ondertekening Voorlopige toepassing Ratificatie

O=Ondertekening zonder voorbehoud of vereiste van ratificatie
R=Bekrachtiging, aanvaarding, goedkeuring of kennisgeving
T=Toetreding
VG=Voortgezette gebondenheid
NB=Niet bekend

In werking Opzegging Buiten werking
Guyana 30-07-2018 (T) 18-04-2019

Autoriteiten Guyana(16 Augustus 2018)

30-07-2018

Competent Authority: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Protocol and Consular Affairs Department

Autoriteiten Andorra(3 Augustus 2018)

13-04-2017

Competent authorities to issue the Apostille in accordance with Article 3, paragraph 1, of the Convention (modification): El/la ministre/a d'Afers Exteriors (The Minister of Foreign Affairs) El/la director/a d'Afers Bilaterals i Consulars (The Director of Bilateral and Consular Affairs) El/la director/a d'Afers Multilaterals i Cooperació (The Director of Multilateral Affairs and Cooperation) El/la cap de l'Àrea d'Afers Generals i Jurídics (The Head of the General and Legal Affairs Unit)

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(10 Juli 2018)

Roemenië, 14-06-2018

Romania takes note of the Declarations submitted by Ukraine on 16 October 2015 regarding the application of the Convention on Civil Procedure (1954), the Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (1961), the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980), the Convention on the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (1965) and the Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children (1996) to the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol and of the Declarations submitted by the Russian Federation on 19 July 2016 in relation to the Declarations made by Ukraine. In relation to the Declarations made by the Russian Federation, Romania declares, in line with the conclusions of the European Council of 20/21 March 2014, that it does not recognise the illegal referendum in Crimea and the illegal annexation of the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol to the Russian Federation. As regards the territorial scope of the above Conventions, Romania therefore considers that the Conventions in principle continue to apply to the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol as part of the territory of Ukraine. Romania further notes the Declarations by Ukraine that the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol are temporarily not under the control of Ukraine and that the application and implementation by Ukraine of its obligations under the Conventions is limited and not guaranteed in relation to this part of Ukraine's territory, and that only the central authorities of Ukraine in Kiev will determine the procedure for relevant communication. As a consequence of the above, Romania declares that it will not engage in any direct communication or interaction with authorities in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol and will not accept any documents or requests emanating from such authorities or through the authorities of the Russian Federation, but will only engage with the central authorities of Ukraine in Kiev for the purposes of the application and implementation of the conventions.

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(25 Juni 2018)

Duitsland, 06-06-2018

The Federal Republic of Germany takes note of the Declarations submitted by Ukraine on 16 October 2015 regarding the application of the Convention on Civil Procedure (1954), the Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (1961), the Convention on the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (1965), the Convention on the taking of evidence abroad in civil or commercial matters (1970), the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980) and the Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children (1996) and the Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance (2007) to the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol and of the Declarations submitted by the Russian Federation on 19 July 2016 in relation to the Declarations made by Ukraine. In relation to the Declarations made by the Russian Federation, the Federal Republic of Germany declares, in line with the conclusions of the European Council of 20/21 March 2014, that it does not recognise the illegal referendum in Crimea and the illegal annexation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol to the Russian Federation. Regarding the territorial scope of the above Conventions, the Federal Republic of Germany therefore considers that the Conventions in principle continue to apply to the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol as part of the territory of Ukraine. The Federal Republic of Germany further notes the Declarations by Ukraine that the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol are temporarily not under the control of Ukraine and that the application and implementation by Ukraine of its obligations under the Conventions is limited and not guaranteed in relation to this part of Ukraine's territory, and that only the government of Ukraine will determine the procedure for relevant communication. As a consequence of the above, the Federal Republic of Germany declares that it will only engage with the government of Ukraine for the purposes of the application and implementation of the conventions with regard to the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol.

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(20 Juni 2018)

Zwitserland, 12-06-2018

Referring to the declaration formulated by the Republic of Serbia with regard to the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents of 5 October 1961 and received by the Depositary on 29 May 2017, Switzerland wishes to notify all Contracting States that, with regard to public documents executed in the territory of Kosovo, Switzerland will recognise as authentic only those documents for which an Apostille has been issued by the competent authorities designated by Kosovo, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the Convention.

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(1 Mei 2018)

Letland, 04-04-2018

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia […] with reference to […] the Convention on Civil Procedure (1954), the Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (1961), the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters (1965), the Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (1970), the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980),and the Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children (1996) has to honour to convey the following. The Government of the Republic of Latvia takes note of the Declarations submitted by Ukraine on 16 October 2015 regarding the application of the aforementioned Conventions to the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol and of the Declarations submitted by the Russian Federation on 19 July 2016 in relation to the Declarations made by Ukraine. In relation to the Declarations made by the Russian Federation, the Republic of Latvia declares, in line with the conclusions of the European Council of 20/21 March 2014, that it does not recognise the illegal referendum in Crimea and the illegal annexation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol to the Russian Federation. As regards the territorial scope of the above Conventions, the Republic of Latvia therefore considers that the Conventions in principle continue to apply to the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol as part of the territory of Ukraine. The Republic of Latvia further notes the Declarations by Ukraine that the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol are temporarily not under the control of Ukraine and that the application and implementation by Ukraine of its obligations under the Convention is limited and not guaranteed in relation to this part of Ukraine's territory, and that only the central authorities of Ukraine in Kyiv will determine the procedure for relevant communication. As a consequence of the above, the Republic of Latvia declares that it will not engage in any direct communication or interaction with authorities in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol and will not accept any documents or requests emanating from such authorities or through the authorities of the Russian Federation, but will only engage with the central authorities of Ukraine in Kiev for the purposes of the application and implementation of the convention.

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(13 April 2018)

Portugal, 13-03-2018

The Government of the Portuguese Republic takes note of the Declaration submitted by Ukraine on 16 October 2015 regarding the application of the Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents, done at The Hague, on 5 October 1961, to the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol and of the Declaration submitted by the Russian Federation on 19 July 2016 in relation to the Declaration made by Ukraine. In relation to the Declaration made by the Russian Federation, the Government of the Portuguese Republic declares, in line with the conclusions of the European Council of 20/21 March 2014, that it does not recognise the illegal referendum in Crimea and the illegal annexation of the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol to the Russian Federation. As regards the territorial scope of the above Convention, the Government of the Portuguese Republic therefore considers that the Convention in principle continues to apply to the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol as part of the territory of Ukraine. The Government of the Portuguese Republic further notes the Declaration by Ukraine that the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol are temporarily not under the control of Ukraine and that the application and implementation by Ukraine of its obligations under the Convention is limited and not guaranteed in relation to this part of Ukraine's territory, and that only the central authorities of Ukraine in Kiev will determine the procedure for relevant communication. As a consequence of the above, the Government of the Portuguese Republic declares that it will not engage in any direct communication or interaction with authorities in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol and will not accept any documents or requests emanating from such authorities or through the authorities of the Russian Federation, but will only engage with the central authorities of Ukraine in Kiev for the purposes of the application and implementation of the convention.

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(30 Maart 2018)

Oostenrijk, 09-03-2018

Austria takes note of the Declarations submitted by Ukraine on 16 October 2015 regarding the application of the Convention on Civil Procedure (1954), the Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (1961), the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980) and the Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children (1996) to the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol and of the Declarations submitted by the Russian Federation on 19 July 2016 in relation to the Declarations made by Ukraine. In relation to the Declarations made by the Russian Federation, Austria declares, in line with the conclusions of the European Council of 20/21 March 2014, that it does not recognise the illegal referendum in Crimea and the illegal annexation of the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol to the Russian Federation. As regards the territorial scope of the above Conventions, Austria therefore considers that the Conventions in principle continue to apply to the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol as part of the territory of Ukraine. Austria further notes the Declarations by Ukraine that the "Autonomous Republic of Crimea" and the city of Sevastopol are temporarily not under the control of Ukraine and that the application and implementation by Ukraine of its obligations under the Conventions is limited and not guaranteed in relation to this part of Ukraine's territory, and that only the central authorities of Ukraine in Kiev will determine the procedure for relevant communication. As a consequence of the above, Austria declares that it will not engage in any direct communication or interaction with authorities in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol and will not accept any documents or requests emanating from such authorities or through the authorities of the Russian Federation, but will only engage with the central authorities of Ukraine in Kiev for the purposes of the application and implementation of the conventions.

Bezwaar tegen toetreding Albanië(15 Maart 2018)

Griekenland, 09-03-2004

In accordance with Article 12, paragraph 2, of the Hague Convention of 5 October 1961, the Government of the Hellenic Republic hereby raises an objection such that the said Convention shall not enter into force between the Hellenic Republic and the Republic of Albania.

Intrekking, 26-02-2018

[…] the Hellenic Republic hereby withdraws its objection to the accession of Albania to the Convention abolishing the requirement of legalization for foreign public documents (The Hague, 5 October 1961).

Autoriteiten Polen(27 Februari 2018)

06-02-2018

[...] the Republic of Poland [...] has the honour to inform that as of 1 February 2018 the following institutions of the Republic of Poland are entitled to issue apostilles: 1. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Legalisation Section 2. Ministry of Culture and National Heritage The Department of Art and Culture Education The following documents are subject to its competence: -certificates, diplomas, indexes or authentications issued by art schools 3. National Agency for Academic Exchange The following documents are subject to its competence: 1) diplomas of graduation with supplements, 2) copies of diplomas of graduation, 3) certificates of diplomas and post-graduate certificates, 4) duplicates of diplomas and post-graduate certificates, 5) certificates of graduation, 6) doctoral and postdoctoral diplomas, as well as their duplicates and copies - in the case of doctoral and post-doctoral degrees awarded by the authorized organizational units of the university.

Bezwaar tegen toetreding Tunesië(30 Januari 2018)

België, 26-01-2018

[…] Belgium objects to the accession of Tunisia to the above mentioned Convention in accordance with Article 12 of the Convention.

Bezwaar tegen toetreding Tunesië(30 Januari 2018)

Griekenland, 25-01-2018

[…] in accordance with Article 12, paragraph 2 of the Hague Convention abolishing the requirement of legalization for foreign public documents of 5 October 1961, the Hellenic Republic hereby objects to the accession of the Republic of Tunisia to the above mentioned Convention.

Bezwaar tegen toetreding Tunesië(19 Januari 2018)

Oostenrijk, 12-01-2018

The Republic of Austria raises an objection to the accession of the Tunisian Republic with reference to Article 12, paragraph 2, of the Convention.

Bezwaar tegen toetreding Tunesië(12 December 2017)

Duitsland, 01-12-2017

The Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany herewith objects to the accession of Tunisia in accordance with article 12, paragraph 2 of the Convention Abolishing the Requirements of Legalization for Foreign Documents (The Hague, October 5th, 1961).

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(22 November 2017)

Frankrijk, 14-11-2017

Referring to the declaration made by Serbia on 29 May 2017, the French Republic wishes to notify all Contracting States that, with regard to public documents executed in the territory of Kosovo and requiring the issue of an Apostille under Article 3 of the Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents, it will recognise as authentic only those documents which have been the subject of an Apostille issued by the competent authorities designated by Kosovo, in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the Convention.

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(15 November 2017)

Oostenrijk, 02-11-2017

Regarding the July 2016 entry into force of the Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents ("the Apostille Convention") for the Republic of Kosovo, Austria shares the view of other Contracting States that, consistent with the obligations under the Apostille Convention, any certification purporting to be an Apostille issued within the territory of the Republic of Kosovo by an entity other than the competent authority designated by the Republic of Kosovo does not have any legal effect.

Autoriteiten Griekenland(9 November 2017)

28-06-2017

Competent Authorities for the issuance of the Apostille: - The Regions for all documents issued by the services/offices of the Regional Self Government; - The Decentralized Administrations, for all documents, for all documents issued by: 1. The public civil services of the Regions that do not fall under the competence of the Regional Self Government; 2. Legal Entities of Public Law; 3. First degree Local Government Organizations; 4. The Registry Offices. - for judicial documents, the First Instance Court of the region where the issuing authority is seated.

Bezwaar tegen toetreding Dominicaanse Republiek(3 November 2017)

Nederlanden, het Koninkrijk der, 26-06-2009

... the Kingdom of the Netherlands (the Kingdom in Europe, the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba) raises an objection to the accession of the Dominican Republic to the Convention abolishing the requirement of legalisation for foreign public documents.

Intrekking, 03-11-2017

The Kingdom of the Netherlands withdraws its declaration made in accordance with Article 12, second paragraph, of the Convention, objecting to the accession of the Dominican Republic to the Convention. Therefore, the Convention will take effect between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Dominican Republic as of 3 November 2017.

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(28 September 2017)

Duitsland, 26-09-2017

Regarding the July 2016 entry into force of the Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (“the Apostille Convention”) for the Republic of Kosovo, Germany wishes to notify all Contracting States that, consistent with its obligations under the Apostille Convention, Germany will not give legal effect under the Convention to any certification purporting to be an Apostille issued within the territory of the Republic of Kosovo by an entity other than the competent authority designated by the Republic of Kosovo . The Special Commission on the Practical Operation of the Apostille Convention of 2016 in its Conclusion and Recommendation 7, as well as Paragraph 113 of the Handbook on the Practical Operation of the Apostille Convention confirm that it is for the law of the place from which a document emanates to determine its public nature. Therefore, the law of the Republic of Kosovo determines whether a document is a public document to which the Apostille Convention applies and to which only the competent authorities of the Republic of Kosovo may affix an Apostille Certificate.

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren(21 September 2017)

Verenigde Staten van Amerika, 06-09-2017

The Embassy of the United States of America […] has the honor to convey that, having regard to the July 2016 entry into force of the Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents ("the Apostille Convention") for the Republic of Kosovo, the United States wishes to notify all Contracting States that, consistent with its obligations under the Apostille Convention, the United States will not give legal effect under the Convention to any certification purporting to be an Apostille issued within the territory of Kosovo by an entity other than the designated Kosovo competent authority. As recognized in Conclusion and Recommendation 7 of the 2016 Special Commission on the Practical Operation of the Apostille Convention, and as memorialized in Paragraph 113 of the Handbook on the Practical Operation of the Apostille Convention, the law of Kosovo determines whether a document is a public document to which the Apostille Convention applies and to which only the competent authorities of Kosovo may affix an Apostille Certificate.

Acties

De informatie in de Verdragenbank vormt geen bekendmaking in de zin van de Grondwet en de Rijkswet goedkeuring en bekendmaking verdragen. Alleen publicatie in het Tractatenblad heeft een officieel karakter .