Convention on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Parties with reservations, declarations and objections
Party | Reservations / Declarations | Objections |
---|---|---|
Australia | Yes | No |
New Zealand | Yes | No |
United States of America | Yes | No |
Australia
07-06-1971
In considering the 'Statement by the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia Concerning
Acceptance by the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia of the Obligations of
Membership in the Organisation' it is felt that the Council would find it useful to
have before it the following information about certain matters relating to such membership.
The Government of Australia wishes to inform the Council of the fact that 'the Commonwealth
of Australia' comprises the six component States of the Australian Federation, together
with mainland federal territories, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern
Territory. The Government is also responsible for the international relations of the
Territory of Papua and New Guinea and of certain other small island territories, which
are collectively known as the External Territories, and which do not form part of
the Commonwealth of Australia. It is the understanding of the Government of Australia
that the obligations of Members of the Organisation are not applicable in their overseas
territories, except where, and to the extent that, it is so stated.
The Government of Australia also wishes to inform the Council that the States of Australia,
and not the Commonwealth of Australia itself, may have constitutional authority to
act with respect to some of the matters which are within the scope of the obligations
resting on Members of the Organisation. The Commonwealth of Australia undertakes,
however, to discharge the obligations of a Member of the Organisation to the fullest
extent compatible with the constitutional system of Australia.
New Zealand
29-05-1973
The Government of New Zealand declares that its accession to the Convention shall not extend to the island territories for whose international relations it is responsible.
United States of America
02-05-1961
[...]
and whereas the Senate of the United States of America by their resolution of March
16, 1961, two-thirds of the Senators present concurring therein, did advise and consent
to the ratification of the said Convention and the two protocols relating thereto
"with the interpretation and explanation of the intent of the Senate that noting in
the Convention, or the advice and consent of the Senate of the ratification thereof,
confers any power on the Executive to bind the United States in substantive matters
beyond what the Executive now has, or to bind the United States without compliance
with applicable procedures imposed by domestic law, or confers any power on the Congress
to take action in fields previously beyon the authority of Congress, or limits Congress
in the exercise of any power it now has.";
[...]