Print
Download XMLOptional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure
Parties with reservations, declarations and objections
| Party | Reservations / Declarations | Objections |
|---|---|---|
| Albania | Yes | No |
| Belgium | Yes | No |
| Chile | Yes | No |
| Czech Republic | Yes | No |
| Denmark | Yes | No |
| Finland | Yes | No |
| Germany | Yes | No |
| Italy | Yes | No |
| Liechtenstein | Yes | No |
| Monaco | Yes | No |
| New Zealand | Yes | No |
| Portugal | Yes | No |
| San Marino | Yes | No |
| Slovakia | Yes | No |
| Slovenia | Yes | No |
| Switzerland | Yes | No |
| Türkiye | Yes | Yes |
| Ukraine | Yes | No |
Albania
29-05-2013
According to article 12, first paragraph of the Optional Protocol, the Republic of Albania hereby declares it accepts the competence of the committee to receive and examine the communications in which a State party claims that another State party does not meet its obligations under the instruments referred to in this paragraph [to] which the State is a party.
Belgium
30-05-2014
The Kingdom of Belgium recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive, pursuant to article 12 of the Optional Protocol, communications from a State party which claims that another State is not fulfilling its obligations.
Chile
01-09-2015
The Republic of Chile declares, in accordance to article 12, entitled Inter-State Communications, of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that another State party is not fulfilling its obligations under any of the following instruments to which the State is a party: the Convention; the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography; and to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the involvement of children in armed conflicts.
Czech Republic
20-05-2016
Pursuant to Article 12 (1) of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communication Procedure, the Czech Republic declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications according to this article.
Denmark
07-10-2015
Territorial exclusion with regard to Greenland and the Faroe Islands.
Finland
12-11-2015
The Republic of Finland declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider inter-state communications made against it provided for in Article 12 of the Protocol.
Germany
28-02-2013
The Federal Republic of Germany recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive
and consider communications pursuant to Article 12(1) of the Optional Protocol.
Italy
20-12-2016
... pursuant to Article 12 (1) of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure, done at New York on 19 December 2011, the Italian Republic declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that another State party is not fulfilling its obligations under the instruments referred to in this Article.
Liechtenstein
25-01-2017
According to Article 12 of the Optional Protocol from 19 December 2011 to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, the Principality of Liechtenstein declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that the Principality of Liechtenstein does not fulfil its obligations under any of the following instruments: the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict, or the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.
Monaco
24-09-2014
Pursuant to Article 13, paragraph 7, of the Protocol, the Principality of Monaco wishes to indicate that it does not recognize the competence of the Committee provided for in the present article in respect of the rights set forth in the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.
New Zealand
22-09-2022
... consistent with the constitutional status of Tokelau and taking into account the commitment of the Government of New Zealand to the development of self-government for Tokelau through an act of self-determination under the Charter of the United Nations, this Accession [by New Zealand] shall not extend to Tokelau unless and until a Declaration to this effect is lodged by the Government of New Zealand with the Depositary on the basis of appropriate consultation with that territory…
Portugal
24-09-2013
The Portuguese Republic declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee
on the Rights of the Child in accordance and for the purposes of article twelve of
the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications
procedure, adopted in New York, on the nineteenth of December of two thousand and
eleven.
San Marino
17-05-2021
The Republic of San Marino declares, in accordance with article 12 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, that it recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications in which a State Party claims that the Republic of San Marino does not fulfil its obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict or the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.
Slovakia
03-12-2013
The Slovak Republic recognizes the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the
Child to receive and consider communications pursuant to Article 12 (1) of the Optional
Protocol.
Slovenia
25-05-2018
Pursuant to Article 12, paragraph 1, of the said Protocol, the Republic of Slovenia declares that it recognises the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that another State party is not fulfilling its obligations under the instruments in this paragraph.
Switzerland
24-04-2017
Pursuant to article 12 (1) of the Protocol, Switzerland recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications under this provision.
Türkiye
26-12-2017
The Republic of Turkey declares with regard to the competence of the Committee on the Rights of the Child as provided for by the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, that the reservations and declarations it made to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in armed conflict and to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography fully retain their validity.
Objection Cyprus, 14-09-2018
The Republic of Cyprus has examined the Declaration made by the Republic of Turkey
on the 26th of December 2017, upon ratifying the Optional Protocol to the Convention
on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure (2011), limiting the competence
of the Committee on the Rights of the Child to those States Parties which it recognizes
and with which it has diplomatic relations. In the view of the Republic of Cyprus,
this Declaration amounts to a Reservation.
To this effect, the Republic of Cyprus would like to state that the Objections it
has made in respect of the Declarations/Reservations of Turkey with regard to the
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement
of Children in armed conflict and to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the
Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography,
fully retain their validity and apply equally to the Reservation of Turkey in respect
to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications
procedure.
Ukraine
02-09-2016
Ukraine states that for the period of temporary occupation of a part of the territory of Ukraine – the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol – as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation and until complete restoration of the constitutional order and effective control by Ukraine over such occupied territory, as well as over certain districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, the application and/or implementation by Ukraine of the obligations under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, as applied to the aforementioned occupied and uncontrolled territory of Ukraine, is limited and is not guaranteed.