Print
Download XMLVerdrag tot bestrijding van wederrechtelijke gedragingen gericht tegen de veiligheid van de zeevaart
Partijen met voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren
| Partij | Voorbehoud / verklaring | Bezwaren |
|---|---|---|
| Algerije | Ja | Nee |
| Andorra | Ja | Nee |
| Argentinië | Ja | Nee |
| Armenië | Ja | Nee |
| Azerbeidzjan | Ja | Nee |
| Brazilië | Ja | Nee |
| Canada | Ja | Nee |
| Chili | Ja | Nee |
| China | Ja | Nee |
| Cuba | Ja | Nee |
| Denemarken | Ja | Nee |
| Duitsland | Ja | Nee |
| Egypte | Ja | Nee |
| Frankrijk | Ja | Nee |
| India | Ja | Nee |
| Irak | Ja | Ja |
| Iran | Ja | Nee |
| Israël | Ja | Nee |
| Jamaica | Ja | Nee |
| Mexico | Ja | Nee |
| Moldavië | Ja | Nee |
| Mozambique | Ja | Nee |
| Myanmar | Ja | Nee |
| Oekraïne | Ja | Nee |
| Paraguay | Ja | Nee |
| Portugal | Ja | Nee |
| Qatar | Ja | Nee |
| Russische Federatie | Ja | Nee |
| Saudi-Arabië | Ja | Nee |
| Tunesië | Ja | Nee |
| Turkije | Ja | Nee |
| Verenigd Koninkrijk | Ja | Nee |
| Verenigde Arabische Emiraten | Ja | Nee |
| Vietnam | Ja | Nee |
Algerije
11-02-1998
The Government of the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation concluded in Rome on 10 March 1988. The Government of the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria declares that for a dispute to be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice, the agreement of all the parties involved shall be necessary in each case.
Andorra
17-07-2006
Andorra is a landlocked State and, at the time of its accession to the Convention
and the Protocol, has no official ships registered. However, in accordance with the
Traffic Code of 10 June 1999, individuals of Andorran nationality and foreigners residing
legally in the country may have their sports vessels entered in a register established
by the Government of Andorra.
In this context, Andorra reserves the right recognized in the United Nations Convention
on the Law of the Sea, in particular article 125, to request transit States (the Kingdom
of Spain and the Republic of France) for right of access to and from the sea, and
freedom of transit through their territories for that purpose.
We, the Co-princes, having read and considered the above-mentioned Convention and
Protocol, hereby express the consent of the State to be bound by the provisions contained
therein, and to that end we command issuance of this instrument of accession, signed
by us and countersigned by the Head of the Government.
Argentinië
17-08-1993
The Argentine Republic declares, in accordance with the provisions of article 16, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that it shall not be bound by any of the provisions of paragraph 1 of that article.
Armenië
08-06-2005
The Republic of Armenia declares that it does not consider itself bound by the 2nd sentence of Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation.
Azerbeidzjan
26-01-2004
In accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 16 of the Convention, the Republic of Azerbaijan declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of Article 16.
Brazilië
25-10-2005
[...] with reservation to article 6, paragraph 2; article 8' and article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention and to article 3, paragraph 2 of the Protocol.
Canada
18-06-1993
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph 3 of the Convention, the Secretary-General has been informed that Canada has established jurisdiction over offences in all of the cases cited in Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention.
Chili
22-04-1994
In connection with the provisions of article 4 of the present Convention, the Government of Chile shall not apply the provisions thereof to incidents that occur in its internal waters and in the waters of Magellan Strait.
China
20-08-1991
The People's Republic of China shall not be bound by paragraph 1 of article 16 of the said Convention.
30-03-2020
The above reservation made on 20-08-1991 by the Government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) to pargraph 1 of Article 16 of the SUA Convention also applies to the Macao Special Administrative Region of the PRC.
Cuba
20-11-2001
The Republic of Cuba, in accordance with paragraph 2 of article 16, declares that
it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 1 of the aforesaid
article, with respect to the settlement of disputes between States Parties, since
it considers that such disputes should be settled by amicable agreement. Similarly,
the Republic of Cuba reiterates that it does not recognize the compulsory jurisdiction
of the International Court of Justice.
Denemarken
25-08-1995
[...] with the qualification, however, that the Convention as well as the Protocol will not apply to the Faroes nor to Greenland, pending a further decision.
Duitsland
06-11-1990
In accordance with article 16, paragraph 2, of the Convention the Federal Republic of Germany declares that it does not consider itself bound by article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
Egypte
08-01-1993
1. A reservation is made to article 16 on the peaceful settlement of disputes because
it provides for the binding jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, and
also with regard to the application of the Convention to seagoing ships in internal
waters which are scheduled to navigate beyond territorial waters.
2. A reservation is made to article 6, paragraph 2, of the Convention and article
3, paragraph 2, of the Protocol because those articles permit the optional jurisdiction
of blackmailed States (which are asked by the perpetrator of an act of terrorism to
do or abstain from doing any act).
This is in compliance with the provision of paragraph 4 of each of the two articles.
Frankrijk
02-12-1991
1. As far as article 3, paragraph 2, is concerned the French Republic understands
by "tentative", "incitation", "complicité" and "menace", la tenative, l'incitation,
la complicité and la menace as defined in the conditions envisaged by French criminal
law.
2. The French Republic does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article
16, paragraph 1, according to which: "Any dispute between two or more States Parties
concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention which cannot be settled
through negotiation within a reasonable time shall, at the request of one of them,
be submitted to arbitration. If, within six months from the date of the request for
arbitration, the parties are unable to agree on the organization of the arbitration
any one of those parties may refer the dispute to the International Court of Justice
by request in conformity with the Statute of the Court.
India
15-10-1999
In accordance with Article 16(2) of the Convention for Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 1988, the Government of the Republic of India hereby declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 16(1).
Irak
10-03-1988
This signature does not in any way imply recognition of Israel or entry into any relationship with it.
Bezwaar Israël, 06-01-2009
The Government of the State of Israel has noted that the reservation made upon the
signature of Iraq of the aforementioned Convention contains a statement with respect
to the State of Israel.
The Government of the State of Israel considers that such a statement, which is explicitly
of a political nature, is incompatible with the purposes and objectives of the Convention.
The Government of the State of Israel, therefore, objects to the aforesaid statement
made by Iraq.
11-02-2019
Pursuant to Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (SUA 1988), the Government of the Republic of Iraq states that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention.
Bezwaar Oostenrijk, 06-01-2020
The Government of Austria has examined the reservation made by the Republic of Iraq
to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime
Navigation (hereinafter "Convention") on 11 February 2019.
Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention provides that a State Party may only "at
the time of signature or ratification, acceptance or approval of this Convention or
accession thereto" declare that it does not consider itself bound by any or all of
the provisions of paragraph 1 of this article.
The Republic of Iraq deposited its instrument of accession to the Convention already
on 21 March 2014, without making the above-mentioned reservation. Austria therefore
considers the reservation to be formulated late and opposes it.
Bezwaar Duitsland, 06-01-2020
Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention provides that a State Party may only at
the time of signature or ratification, acceptance or approval of this Convention or
accession thereto declare that it does not consider itself bound by any or all of
the provisions of paragraph 1 of this article.
The Republic of Iraq deposited its instrument of accession to the Convention on March
21, 2014, without making the above-mentioned reservation. The Federal Republic of
Germany therefore regards the reservation as not having been made in due time and
hereby opposes it.
Bezwaar Finland, 07-02-2020
In accordance with article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention, each State may at the
time of signature or ratification, acceptance or approval of the Convention or accession
thereto, declare that it does not consider itself bound by any or all of the provisions
of paragraph 1 of this article.
The Government of Finland recalls that the Republic of Iraq deposited its instrument
of accession to the Convention on 21 March 2014. The reservation related to article
16, paragraph 1 of the Convention was made on 11 February 2019. Hence, the reservation
was formulated too late. The Government of Finland, therefore, opposes the reservation
on account of its late formulation, and considers it devoid of any legal effect.
Bezwaar Nederlanden, het Koninkrijk der, 10-02-2020
In accordance with article 16, paragraph 2, of the Convention, each State Party may,
at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance or approval of or accession to
this Convention, declare that it does not consider itself bound by any or all of the
provisions of paragraph 1 of this article. The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands
recalls that the Republic of Iraq deposited its instrument of ratification on 21 March
2014. Since the abovementioned reservation was deposited on 11 February 2019, it was
deposited too late by the Republic of Iraq.
The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands objects to this late reservation
by the Republic of Iraq and considers it devoid of any legal effect.
This objection shall not preclude the continued application of the Convention between
the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Iraq.
Bezwaar Portugal, 10-02-2020
The Government of the Portuguese Republic has examined the reservation formulated
on 11 February 2019 by the Republic of Iraq to article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention
for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation.
Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention provides that a State Party may only declare
that it does not consider itself bound by any or all of the provisions of paragraph
1 of this Article 'at the time of signature or ratification, acceptance or approval
of this Convention or accession thereto'.
As the Republic of Iraq deposited its instrument of accession to the Convention on
21 March 2014 without making the above-mentioned reservation, the Portuguese Republic
considers the reservation to be formulated late and thus opposes it.
Bezwaar Roemenië, 11-02-2020
In accordance with article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention, each State may at the
time of signature or ratification, acceptance or approval of the Convention or accession
thereto, declare that it does not consider itself bound by any or all of the provisions
of paragraph 1 of this article.
The Government of Romania recalls that the Republic of Iraq deposited its instrument
of accession to the Convention on 24 March 2014. The reservation related to article
16, paragraph 1 of the Convention was made on 11 February 2019. Hence, the reservation
was not formulated in conformity with article 16, paragraph 2. The Government of Romania,
therefore, opposes to the reservation on account of its late formulation, and considers
it devoid of any legal effect.
Iran
30-10-2009
Pursuant to Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful
Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, the Government of the Islamic Republic
of Iran declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article
16, paragraph 1 of the Convention. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran
affirms that the consent of all parties to such a dispute is necessary in each individual
case, for the submission of the dispute to arbitration or to the International Court
of Justice. The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran can, if it deems appropriate,
agree with the submission of the dispute to arbitration in accordance with the Constitution
of the Islamic Republic of Iran and related domestic Law.
With regard to Article 11, paragraph 4, the Islamic Republic of Iran considers that
the extradition would be applicable only to the State Party within the territorial
jurisdiction of which the crime has occurred. In the case where an extradition agreement
exists between the requesting State and the State in which the crime has occurred,
the agreement shall be applied.
Israël
06-01-2009
Pusuant to Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, the Government of Israel declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention.
Jamaica
17-08-2005
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph 2(c) of the Convention, the Secretary-General has been informed that Jamaica has established jurisdiction over the offences set forth in Article 3.
Mexico
13-05-1994
Mexico's accession to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against
the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 1988, and to its Protocol for the Suppression of
Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf,
1988, is on the understanding that in matters relating to extradition, both article
11 of the Convention and article 3 of the Protocol will be applied in the Republic
of Mexico subject to the modalities and procedures laid down in the applicable provisions
of national law.
Moldavië
11-10-2005
Until the full re-establishment of the territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova,
the provisions of the Convention shall be applied only on the territory controlled
by the authorities of the Republic of Moldova.
The Republic of Moldova shall apply the provisions of article 8, paragraph 1 of the
Convention as far as it will not infringe its own national legislation.
The Republic of Moldova declares that it shall establish its own jurisdiction over
the offences specified in article 3 of the Convention, in cases provided in article
6, paragraph 2 of this Convention.
According to article 16, paragraph 2 of the Convention, the Republic of Moldova does
not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention.
Mozambique
08-01-2003
The Republic of Mozambique does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article
16, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
In this connection, the Republic of Mozambique states that, in each individual case,
the consent of all Parties to such a dispute is necessary for the submission of the
dispute to arbitration or to International Court of Justice.
Furthermore, the Republic of Mozambique declares that:
The Republic of Mozambique, in accordance with its Constitution and domestic laws,
can not extradite Mozambique citizens.
Therefore, Mozambique citizens will be tried and sentenced in national courts.
Myanmar
19-09-2003
The Government of the Union of Myanmar wished to express reservation of Article 16(1)
relating to arbitration and does not consider itself bound by the same.
Oekraïne
16-10-2015
In February 2014 the Russian Federation launched armed aggression against Ukraine
and occupied a part of the territory of Ukraine – the Autonomous Republic of Crimea
and the city of Sevastopol, and today exercises effective control over certain districts
of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine. These actions are in gross violation
of the Charter of the United Nations and constitute a threat to international peace
and security. The Russian Federation, as the Aggressor State and Occupying Power,
bears full responsibility for its actions and their consequences under international
law.
The United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/68/262 of 27 March 2014 confirmed
the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized
borders. The United Nations also called upon all States, international organizations
and specialized agencies not to recognize any alteration of the status of the Autonomous
Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol.
In this regard, Ukraine states that from 20 February 2014 and for the period of temporary
occupation by the Russian Federation of a part of the territory of Ukraine – the Autonomous
Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol – as a result of the armed aggression
of the Russian Federation committed against Ukraine and until the complete restoration
of the constitutional law and order and effective control by Ukraine over such occupied
territory, as well as over certain districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of
Ukraine, which are temporarily not under control of Ukraine as a result of the aggression
of the Russian Federation, the application and implementation by Ukraine of the obligations
under the above Conventions, Protocols, Agreement, as applied to the aforementioned
occupied and uncontrolled territory of Ukraine, is limited and is not guaranteed.
Documents or requests made or issued by the occupying authorities of the Russian
Federation, its officials at any level in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the
city of Sevastopol and by the illegal authorities in certain districts of the Donetsk
and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, which are temporarily not under control of Ukraine,
are null and void and have no legal effect regardless of whether they are presented
directly or indirectly through the authorities of the Russian Federation.
The provisions of the Conventions, Protocols, Agreement regarding the possibility
of direct communication or interaction do not apply to the territorial organs of Ukraine
in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, as well as in certain
districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, which are temporarily not
under control of Ukraine. The order of the relevant communication is determined by
the central authorities of Ukraine in Kyiv.
Paraguay
12-11-2004
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 6 of the Convention, the Secretary-General has been informed that the Republic of Paraguay has established jurisdiction in accordance with Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Convention.
Portugal
05-01-1996
In face of its internal law Portugal considers that the handing over of the suspect mentioned in article 8 of the Convention can only be based on strong suspicions that he committed any of the crimes mentioned in article 3, and will always depend on a court decision. Furthermore it will not be admitted in the event that the crime ascribed entails death sentence.
Qatar
18-09-2003
Subject to reservation in respect of article 16(a).
Russische Federatie
04-05-2001
The Russian Federation applies the provisions of point 1 of article 8 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation to the extent to which they do not conflict with its own legislation.
Saudi-Arabië
02-02-2006
This document announces the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's accession to and approval of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation and the Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, with full reservation as to Article 11 and Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
Tunesië
06-03-1998
The Republic of Tunisia, in agreeing to accede to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation concluded in Rome on 10 March 1988, declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 1 of article 16 of the Convention and maintains that disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention may be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice only with the prior agreement of all the parties involved.
Turkije
06-03-1998
In signing the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation and the Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, the Government of the Republic of Turkey, under the article 16(2) of the said Convention declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph (1) of the article 16 of the said Convention.
Verenigd Koninkrijk
03-05-1991
[...] that until consultations with various territories under the territorial sovereignty of the United Kingdom are completed, the Convention and Protocol will apply in respect of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland only. Consultations with the territories are in hand and are expected to be completed by the end of 1991.
Verenigde Arabische Emiraten
15-09-2005
The Government of the United Arab Emirates has taken cognizance of the provisions of the aforementioned Convention and Protocol and accedes to them with full reservation in respect of the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention, concerning the settlement of a dispute between States Parties to the Convention by arbitration or, if they are unable to agree on the organization of arbitration, by referral of the dispute to the International Court of Justice. It also enters a full reservation with respect to the provisions of article 1 of the Protocol, insofar as they refer to article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation.
Vietnam
12-07-2000
According to the Convention, the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam makes its reservation to paragraph 1 of article 16 thereof.