Print
Download XMLProtocol tot wijziging van het Enkelvoudig Verdrag inzake verdovende middelen, 1961
Partijen met voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren
| Partij | Voorbehoud / verklaring | Bezwaren |
|---|---|---|
| Algerije | Ja | Ja |
| Argentinië | Ja | Nee |
| België | Ja | Nee |
| Brazilië | Ja | Nee |
| Canada | Ja | Nee |
| Cuba | Ja | Nee |
| Griekenland | Ja | Nee |
| India | Ja | Nee |
| Irak | Ja | Ja |
| Israël | Ja | Nee |
| Koeweit | Ja | Ja |
| Mexico | Ja | Nee |
| Montenegro | Ja | Nee |
| Myanmar | Ja | Nee |
| Panama | Ja | Nee |
| Peru | Ja | Nee |
| Roemenië | Ja | Nee |
| Servië | Ja | Nee |
Algerije
26-02-2003
The accession of the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria to the present Protocol
shall in no way signify recognition of Israel.
This accession may not be construed as leading to entry into relations of any kind
with Israel.
Bezwaar Israël, 30-09-2003
The Government of the State of Israel has noted that the instrument of ratification
of Algeria to the above mentioned Protocol contains a declaration with respect to
the State of Israel. The Government of the State of Israel is of the view that such
declaration, which is explicitly of a political nature, is incompatible with the purposes
and objectives of this Protocol.
The Government of the State of Israel therefore objects to the aforesaid declaration
made by Algeria to the Protocol of 1972 Amending the Single Convention on Narcotic
Drugs, 1961.
Argentinië
03-10-1983
[The Government of Argentina makes a] formal objection to the declaration of territorial
extension issued by the United Kingdom with regard to the Malvinas Islands (and dependencies),
which that country is illegally occupying and refers to as the "Falkland Islands".
The Argentine Republic rejects and considers null and void the [said declaration]
of territorial extension.
België
13-06-1984
With a reservation concerning the following articles:
1. Article 5 amending article 12 (5) of the Single Convention;
2. Article 9 amending article 29 (1), (2) and (5) of the Single Convention.
Brazilië
16-05-1973
Brazil wishes to take this opportunity to repeat the declaration that was made at
the appropriate occasion during the plenary session of the Protocol's Negotiating
Conference which took place in Geneva from March 6th to March 24th, 1972, to the effect
that the amendments to article 36 of the Convention do not oblige States with laws
against extradition of nationals to extradite them.
Under the terms of article 21 of the Protocol, Brazil wishes to make it clear that
it does not accept the amendment introduced by article 1 of the Protocol to article
2, para. 4, of the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.
Canada
05-08-1976
Subject to a reservation with respect to subparagraphs (i), (ii) and (iii) of paragraph 2 (b) of the amending article 14.
Cuba
14-12-1998
The accession of the Republic of Cuba to the 1972 Protocol amending the Single Convention
on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, shall not be interpreted as recognition of acceptance on
the part of the Government of the Republic of Cuba to the racist Government of South
Africa, which does not represent the South African people and which, because of its
systematic practice of the discriminatory policy of apartheid, has been expelled from
international agencies, condemned by the United Nations and rejected by all the peoples
of the world.
The accession of the Republic of Cuba to the 1972 Protocol amending the Single Convention
on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, shall not be interpreted as recognition or acceptance on
the part of the Government of the Republic of Cuba of the Government of the Republic
of Korea, because Cuba considers that it does not genuinely represent the interests
of the Korean people.
The Government of the Republic of Cuba declares with respect to the provisions contained
in article 14, paragraph (2) (b) (ii), that in accordance with its legal system, and
its national laws and practice, it makes extradition conditional only on the existence
of bilateral treaties.
Griekenland
12-07-1985
With a reservation to article 1 (4) amending the article 2 of the Single Convention.
India
14-12-1978
The Government of India reserve their position with regard to articles 5, 6, 9, 11 and 14 of the aforesaid Protocol and do not consider themselves bound by the provisions of these articles. [T]he Government of India clarified that the reservation made with regard to article 14 of the Protocol relates only to paragraph 2 (b) of article 36 of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961.
Irak
25-09-1978
This accession shall, however, in no way signify recognition of Israel or entry into any relations therewith.
Bezwaar Israël, 11-05-1979
The instrument of acceptance by the Government of Iraq of the Protocol contains a
statement of a political character in respect to Israel. In the view of the Government
of Israel, this is not the proper place for making such political pronouncements,
which are, moreover, in flagrant contradiction to the principles, objects and purposes
of the Protocol. That statement, therefore, possesses no legal validity whatsoever.
The Government of Israel utterly rejects that statement and will proceed on the assumption
that it has no validity as to the rights and duties of any State Party to the said
treaties.
The declaration of the Government of Iraq cannot in any way affect Iraq's obligations
under whatever other obligations are binding upon that State by virtue of general
international law.
The Government of Israel, will, in so far as concerns the substance of the matter,
adopt toward the Government of Iraq an attitude of complete reciprocity.
Israël
27-03-1972
The Government of Israel will not proceed to the ratification of the Protocol until it has received assurances that all the neighbouring States who intend to become parties to it will do so without reservation or declaration, and that the so-called reservation or declaration referring to Israel and made by one of Israel's neighbours in connection with its participation in the1961 Single Convention, and which was quoted at the meeting of the Second Committee on 18 March 1972, is withdrawn.
01-02-1974
The Government of the State of Israel, in accordance with the powers vested in it by the law, decided to ratify the Protocol while maintaining all its rights to adopt toward all other parties an attitude of complete reciprocity.
Koeweit
07-11-1973
The Government of the State of Kuwait takes the view that its accession to the said Protocol does not in any way imply its recognition of Israel, nor does it oblige it to apply the provisions of the aforementioned Protocol in respect of the said country.
Bezwaar Israël, 26-12-1973
The instrument of acceptance by the Government of Kuwait of the Protocol contains
a statement of a political character in respect to Israel. In the view of the Government
of Israel, this is not the proper place for making such political pronouncements,
which are, moreover, in flagrant contradiction to the principles, objects and purposes
of the Protocol. That statement, therefore, possesses no legal validity whatsoever.
The Government of Israel utterly rejects that statement and will proceed on the assumption
that it has no validity as to the rights and duties of any State Party to the said
treaties.
The declaration of the Government of Kuwait cannot in any way affect Kuwait's obligations
under whatever other obligations are binding upon that State by virtue of general
international law.
The Government of Israel, will, in so far as concerns the substance of the matter,
adopt toward the Government of Kuwait an attitude of complete reciprocity.
Mexico
27-04-1977
In accordance with the provisions of article 21 `Reservations' of the Protocol amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, adopted in Geneva on 25 March 1972, the Government of Mexico, in acceding to that international instrument, makes an explicit reservation in respect of the application of articles 5 (amendment to article 12, paragraph 5, of the Single Convention); 6 (amendment to article 14, paragraphs 1 and 2, of the Single Convention); and 11 (new article 21 bis, Limitation of Production of Opium). Accordingly, as regards the articles in respect of which this reservation is made, Mexico will be bound by the corresponding texts of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, in their original form.
Montenegro
23-10-2006
With the reservations that articles 9 and 11 of the Protocol shall not apply in the territory of (Montenegro).
Myanmar
22-08-2003
The Government of the Union of Myanmar wishes to express reservation on Article 6
relating to the right of International Narcotics Control Board (INCB).
The Government wishes to make a reservation on Article 14, Paragraph 2(b) to extradition
and does not consider itself bound by the same in so far as its own Myanmar nations
are concerned.
Panama
19-10-1972
With the express reservation that the amendment which article 14 of the Protocol makes to article 36, paragraph 2, of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 (a) does not modify the extradition treaties to which the Republic of Panama is a party in any manner which may compel it to extradite its own nationals; (b) does not require the Republic of Panama to include, in such extradition treaties as it may conclude in the future, any provision requiring it to extradite its own nationals; and (c) may not be interpreted or applied in any manner which gives rise to an obligation on the part of the Republic of Panama to extradite any of its own nationals.
Peru
12-09-1977
[The Government of Peru] entertains reservations concerning the last part of the second paragraph of article 5 of the Protocol, amending article 12, paragraph 5, of the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, as it considers that the powers conferred therein on the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) are incompatible with its role as a co-ordinating body for national control systems and give it supranational supervisory functions.
Roemenië
14-01-1974
The Socialist Republic of Romania does not consider itself bound by the provisions
contained in article 6, insofar as those provisions relate to States which are not
parties to the Single Convention.
The Council of State of the Socialist Republic of Romania considers that the provisions
of article 17 of the Protocol are not in accordance with the principle that international
multilateral treaties, the aims and objectives of which concern the world community
as a whole, should be open to participation by all States.
Servië
12-03-2001
With the reservations that articles 9 and 11 of the Protocol shall not apply in the territory of Serbia.