Verdrag inzake de Internationale Bepalingen ter voorkoming van aanvaringen op zee, 1972
Partijen met voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren
Partij | Voorbehoud / verklaring | Bezwaren |
---|---|---|
Argentinië | Ja | Ja |
Canada | Ja | Nee |
Cuba | Ja | Nee |
Hongarije | Ja | Nee |
Koeweit | Ja | Ja |
Roemenië | Ja | Nee |
Russische Federatie | Ja | Nee |
Slowakije | Ja | Nee |
Syrië | Ja | Nee |
Argentinië
12-08-1986
[...] the Argentine Government rejects the extension made by the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland of the application to the Malvinas Islands, South
Georgia and South Sandwich Islands of the [...] Convention on the International Regulations
for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, as amended [...] and reaffrims the right of
sovereignty of the Argentine Republic over those archipelagos which form part of its
national territory.
The General Assembly of the United Nations has adopted resolutions 2065 (XX), 3160
(XXVIII), 31/49, 37/9, 38/12 and 39/6 which recognize the existence of a sovereignty
dispute relating to the question of the Malvinas Islands, urging the Argentine Republic
and the United Kingdom to resume negotiations in order to find, as sson as possible,
a peaceful and definitive solution to the dispute through the good offices of the
Secretary-General of the United Nations who is requested to inform the General Assembly
on the progress made. Similarly, the General Assembly of the United Nations at its
fortieth session adopted resolution 40/21 of 27 November 1985 which again urges both
parties to resume the said negotiations.
Bezwaar Verenigd Koninkrijk, 03-02-1987
The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland cannot
accept the statement made by the Argentine Republic as regards the Falkland Islands
and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. The Government of the United Kingdom
of Great Britain and Northern Ireland have no doubt as to the United Kingdom sovereignty
over the Falkland Islands and South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands and, accordingly,
their right to extend the application of the Treaties to the Falkland Islands and
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands.
Equally, while noting the Argentine reference to the provisions of Article IV of the
Antarctic Treaty signed at Washington on 1 December 1959, the Government of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland have no doubt as to the sovereignty
of the United Kingdom over the British Antarctic Territory, and to the right to extend
the application of the treaties in question to that Territory.
Canada
07-03-1975
The Government of Canada considers that the provisions of rule 10, 'Traffic Separation
Schemes', do not provide for compulsory use of the adopted schemes. The Government
of Canada considers that the compulsory routeing of ships is necessary to avoid collisions
between ships and the resulting damage to the marine environment.
The Government of Canada notes that there are no exceptions to rule 10(b) (c) and
(h) for vessels engaged in fishing with nets, lines, trawls, trolling lines or other
apparatus, or for vessels engaged in special operations such as survey, cable, buoy,
pipeline or salvage operations, and that the exceptions in rule 10(e) are not broad
enough to adequately provide for vessels engaged in special operations. The Government
of Canada considers that the practical application of rule 10 would be complicated
without realistic exceptions for fishing vessels and for vessels engaged in special
operations.
The Government of Canada therefore does not consider that it is prohibited from providing
for the compulsory use of traffic separation schemes or providing for such exceptions
to rule 10(b), (c), (e) and (h).
Cuba
07-11-1983
The Government of the Republic of Cuba considers that the provisions of article II
of the Convention, notwithstanding the fact that it deals with matters of interest
for all States, are discriminatory in nature in that they withhold from a number of
States the right of signature and accession, which is contrary to the principle of
universality.
The Government of the Republic of Cuba considers that the application of the provisions
contained in article III of the Convention is at variance with the Declaration on
the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples contained in resolution
1514(XV) adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 14 December 1960,
which proclaims the necessity of putting a speedy and unconditional end to colonialism
in all its forms and manifestations.
Hongarije
15-12-1976
The Presidential Council of the Hungarian People's Republic declares that article
II, paragraph (2) of the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing
Collisions at Sea of 1972, which does not allow some States to become a Party to the
Convention, is of discriminative nature. The Convention regulates such questions which
concern all States and, therefore, under the principle of sovereign equality of States,
it should be open for all States without any restriction and discrimination.
The Presidential Council of the Hungarian People's Republic also declares that article
III of the Convention is at variance with the UN General Assembly's resolution No.
1514(XV) of 14 December 1960 on the granting of independence to the colonial countries
and peoples, which declared the necessity of the unconditional elimination of all
forms of colonialism.
Koeweit
04-06-1979
It is understood that the ratification of the State of Kuwait of the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea and Regulations attached thereto done at London, on the 20th of October, 1972, does not in any way mean recognition of Israel by the State of Kuwait. Furthermore, no treaty relations will arise between the State of Kuwait and Israel.
Bezwaar Israël, 03-12-1979
The instrument of acceptance deposited by the Government of the State of Kuwait was accompanied by a statement of a political character in respect of Israel. In the view of the Government of Israel, this Convention is not the proper place for making such political pronouncements. Moreover, the said declaration cannot in any way affect whatever obligations are binding upon Kuwait under general international law or under particular conventions. The Government of Israel will, so far as concerns the substance of the matter, adopt towards the Government of the State of Kuwait an attitude of complete reciprocity.
Roemenië
27-03-1975
(a) The Council of State of the Socialist Republic of Romania considers that the provisions
of rule 18(2) of the Convention are not in accord with the principle whereby international
treaties, the objectives and aims of which are of concern to the international community
as a whole, should be open to participation by all States.
(b) The Council of State of the Socialist Republic of Romania considers that the maintenance
in a state of dependence of certain territories, to which the provisions of article
III of the Convention refer, is not in accord with the Charter of the United Nations
and the documents adopted by the United Nations concerning the granting of independence
to colonial countries and peoples, including the Declaration on the principles of
international law affecting friendly relations and co-operation between States in
accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, unanimously adopted by the UN General
Assembly resolution 2625(XXV) of 1970, which solemnly proclaims the right of States
to encourage achievement of the principle of the equality of rights of peoples and
their right to take their own decisions, with a view to putting a swift end to colonialism.
Russische Federatie
09-11-1973
The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics declares that article II, paragraph 2, of
the 1972 Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, under which certain States are precluded from becoming parties to that Convention,
is of a discriminatory character, and considers that, in accordance with the principle
of the sovereign equality of States, the Convention should be open to participation
by all interested States without discrimination or restriction.
The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics also deems it necessary to declare that the
provisions of article III of the 1972 Convention on the International Regulations
for Preventing Collisions at Sea, concerning the extension of its application to a
territory for whose international relations a Contracting Party is responsible, are
out-dated and contrary to the Declaration of the General Assembly of the United Nations
on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples (resolution 1514(XV)
of 14 December 1960), which proclaimed the necessity of bringing to a speedy and unconditional
end colonialism in all its forms and manifestations.
Slowakije
30-01-1995
Slovakia considers itself bound by this treaty, including reservations and declarations
made earlier by the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic:
[...] that the provision of article II, paragraph 2 of the Convention on the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea - COLREG (London 1972) prevents some
States from becoming parties to the Convention. It is therefore of the opinion that
the Convention should be opened to all the interested countries in keeping with the
principle of equal sovereignty of States.
The Czechoslovak Socialist Republic deems it also necessary to declare that the provision
of article III of the Convention, dealing with the extension of its validity to territories
for whose international relations the party to the Convention is responsible, is at
variance with the United Nations General Assembly Declaration on the Granting of Independence
to Colonial Countries and Peoples (resolution 1514(XV) of 14 December 1960) which
proclaimed the necessity of putting a speedy and unconditional end to colonialism
in all its forms and manifestations.
Syrië
16-02-1976
[...] the acceptance of the Syrian Arab Republic to the regulations stipulated in the said Convention and its ratification do not imply in any way the recognition in Israel and do not lead to its engagement with it in any dealings that may be regulated by the said Convention.