Verdrag betreffende de overeenkomst tot internationaal vervoer van goederen over de weg (CMR)
Partijen met voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren
Partij | Voorbehoud / verklaring | Bezwaren |
---|---|---|
Hongarije | Ja | Nee |
Ierland | Ja | Nee |
Marokko | Ja | Nee |
Oekraïne | Ja | Nee |
Oman | Ja | Nee |
Pakistan | Ja | Nee |
Roemenië | Ja | Nee |
Russische Federatie | Ja | Nee |
Spanje | Ja | Ja |
Turkije | Ja | Nee |
Hongarije
29-04-1970
1. The Hungarian People's Republic deems it necessary to call attention to the discriminative
character of article 42 of the Convention by which a number of States are debarred
from accession to the Convention. The matters regulated by the Convention concern
the interests of all States, and therefore, in conformity with the principle of the
sovereign equality of States, no State should be prevented from becoming a Party to
such a Convention.
2. The Hungarian People's Republic points out that the provisions of article 46 of
the Convention are contrary to the principle of international law recording the self-determination
of peoples as well as to United Nations General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14
December 1960 on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples.
Ierland
31-01-1991
Accession does not imply acceptance of the term `Republic of' used in the first paragraph [of the Protocol of Signature to the Convention].
Marokko
23-02-1995
Pursuant to article 48 of the said Convention, the Kingdom of Morocco does not consider
itself bound by the provisions of article 47 of the Convention, under which any dispute
between two or more Parties relating to the interpretation or application of the present
Convention which is not settled by negotiation or other means may, at the request
of anyone of the Contracting Parties concerned, be referred for settlement to the
International Court of Justice.
The Kingdom of Morocco declares that in order for a dispute between two or more Parties
to be referred to the International Court of Justice, it is necessary to have the
consent of all States Parties to the dispute in each individual case.
Oekraïne
16-02-2007
Pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 48 of the Convention Ukraine does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 47 of the Convention.
Oman
23-09-2020
… [the Government of Oman makes] a reservation to Article 47 [of the Convention].
Pakistan
30-05-2019
[T]he Government of Pakistan declares, in terms of article 48 of the Convention, that it does not consider itself bound by article 47 of the Convention, under which any dispute between two or more Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation or application of the Convention, which the parties are unable to settle by negotiation or other means, may, at the request of any one of the Contracting Parties concerned, be referred to the International Court of Justice.
Roemenië
23-01-1973
The Socialist Republic of Romania declares, pursuant to article 48 of the Convention
on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR), done at Geneva
on 19 May 1956, that it does not consider itself as bound by article 47 of the Convention,
under which any dispute between two or more Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation
or application of the Convention which is not settled by negotiation or other means
may, at the request of any one of the Contracting Parties concerned, be referred to
the International Court of Justice.
The Socialist Republic of Romania considers that such disputes may be referred to
the International Court of Justice only with the consent of all parties to the dispute
in each individual case.
The Council of State of the Socialist Republic of Romania declares that the provisions
of article 42, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Convention are not in keeping with the principle
that multilateral international treaties must be open for participation by all States
for which the aim and purpose of such treaties are of concern.
The Council of State of the Socialist Republic of Romania declares that the maintenance
of the dependent status of certain territories to which reference is made in article
46 of the Convention is not in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations and
the documents adopted by the United Nations concerning the granting of independence
to colonial countries and peoples, including the Declaration on Principles of International
Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with
the Charter of the United Nations, unanimously adopted in 1970 by the General Assembly
in its resolution 2625 (XXV), which solemnly proclaims the duty of States to promote
realization of the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples in
order to bring a speedy end to colonialism.
Russische Federatie
02-09-1983
The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics declares that the provisions of article 46
of the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road,
1956, to the effect that Contracting Parties may extend the Convention to territories
for the international relations of which they are responsible, are outmoded and at
variance with Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and
Peoples adopted by the United Nations General Assembly [resolution 1514 (XV) of 14
December 1960].
The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics does not consider itself bound by the provisions
of article 47 of the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of
Goods by Road, 1956, to the effect that disputes relating to the interpretation or
application of the Convention may be referred to the International Court of Justice
at the request of any one of the parties to the dispute, and states that the referral
of such a dispute to the International Court of Justice must be subject to the agreement
of all the parties to the dispute in each specific case.
Spanje
12-02-1974
The Government of Spain declared in its instrument of accession to the Convention
that Spain did not consider itself bound by the United Kingdom communication notifying
the extension of the Convention to Gibraltar, since it would not apply the Convention
to Gibraltar by reason of the fact that article X of the Treaty of Utrecht signed
on 13 July 1713 did not grant Gibraltar communication by land with Spain. In a subsequent
communication, received on 12 February 1974, the Government of Spain stated that in
making the above-quoted declaration its intention was not to formulate a reservation
that might be covered by article 48 (3) of the Convention, but to place on record
the fact that Spain did not consider itself bound by the communication from the Government
of the United Kingdom, a communication which had no legal force whatever inasmuch
as it was contrary to article X of the Treaty of Utrecht.
Bezwaar Verenigd Koninkrijk, 11-09-1974
The Government of the United Kingdom does not accept the statements made by the Government of Spain in its instrument of accession and in the letter received by the Secretary-General on 12 February 1974, concerning the effect of article X of the Treaty of Utrecht and the legal force of the notification by the Government of the United Kingdom of the extension of the Convention to Gibraltar.
Turkije
02-08-1995
The Republic of Turkey does not consider itself bound by article 47 of the Convention, under which any dispute between two or more Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation or application of the Convention which is not settled by negotiation or other means may, at the request of any of the Contracting Parties concerned, be referred to the International Court of Justice.